[sthguard]

Coulter’s column is good, but I’m hitting brick walls when I try to cite it with libs. Do you happen to have another source for the 34 witnesses figure?

(To clarify: I’m not questioning the accuracy of Coulter’s account; I just want to cover my bases when I destroy the “seven out of nine recanted” BS.)

[DrewsMum]

i believe someone cited it on the ann coulter/this story thread

[politicalmerc]

http://www.gasd.uscourts.gov/pdf/409cv00130_92part1.pdf

This is the first 30+ pages of the Federal Court Order going over the dozens of eye witness reports. The rest of the case is on another thread, I'll try to find and repost it.

[politicalmerc]

It was in the 170+ page federal reexamination brief that prosecutors submitted in support of his sentence ...

For pages 1-62:

http://www.gasd.uscourts.gov/pdf/409cv00130_92part1.pdf

For pages 63-174:

http://www.gasd.uscourts.gov/pdf/409cv00130_92part2.pdf

[Nitehawk0325]

Just tell the liberals, a judge from the appellate court, I think, interviewed a number of the people who recanted their stories and said they were all unreliable or questionable. The only people that changed their stories were people in his family and friends.
By the way, the judge was appointed by Clinton. Libtard judge who did his job. Finally, one does something correct.