[Cboldt]

-- No mention of size, traffic, etc. Blatantly unconstitutional. --

IIRC, there is another section of the code with definitions, and sizes.

-- Very weak straw man argument. --

The point of the nutty hypothetical was to see if you thought the 1st amendment always trums zoning. You say it does.

-- Do your homework, study your own country's history. --

Thanks for the friendly advice, Ears.

[Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears]

>>The point of the nutty hypothetical was to see if you thought the 1st amendment always trums zoning. You say it does.<<

It most certainly does. That’s why it’s the “First” amendment.

Sadly, though, the First Amendment has been lawyered to death, and many Americans are so clueless about American history that they don’t see any problem with “religious zoning,” to where they think religious liberty requires a permit from the state.

Shameful.