>>My general point in this thread is that the issue can be viewed as land use, and at some point, most people (but not you) will agree that it’s okay, even constitutional, to have zoning so the residential communities retain their residential character, and aren’t changed by the presence of too many establishments creating traffic, thereby changing the character of the neighborhood.<<
Let’s take “religious liberty” out of the equation for a moment (even though we can’t).
These people are specifically targeted, why? Because of their number? No, that is no even mentioned in the statute.
Because of parking, or noise? No, certainly those are covered in other statutes.
They are TARGETED because of what they are DISCUSSING on their own private property (the Bible).
In other words, they could get together to watch the Superbowl, but not discuss religion. WHAT???
The government is regulating their speech and their thoughts and their communication.
That is NOT America.
How do you know this is true? I saw no mention of it in the article.