Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

Did she take cash from Merck and then mandate a Merck product on the people of SC by executive fiat? Did she require the legislature to override her actions?

No? Hmmmm indeed....

I wonder if she was part of the unanimous vote against the bill...


5 posted on 09/19/2011 9:03:18 AM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm (Perry's idea of border control: Use both hands to welcome the illegals right in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: perfect_rovian_storm

Who knows yet exactly what she did?

We here are just now hearing about this. At least to this degree of airing.

Perry’s involvement has been attacked mercilessly from every conceivable angle. Every conceivable one, no angle left out.

Therefore, to be consistent, whatever angle is used against Rick Perry...whatever one, no exceptions, can be used legitimately against Nikki Haley.

I don’t subscribe to the distortions that you use to describe what happened in Texas. I describe it coming from Perry’s standpoint, and I have proven that he did not, could not, have done what he did unless he believed the people of tx would welcome this addition to the school vaccine program. Otherwise, you would have to stupidly believe that he wanted to have the people rebuff him, that he wanted to be embarrassed for life that he had to backtrack when he heard the voice of the people.

That proves he would not have gone ahead, Merck or no Merck, let me repeat, he would not have gone ahead, Merck or no Merck, if he had not thought it would be welcomed Cancer protection for kids, not rejected and thrown back in his face as an embarrassment for all time to come.

Likewise, Nikki Haley obviously thought it was the thing to do. Let me repeat, she obviously thought it was the thing to do. She found out otherwise. Just like Rick Perry found out otherwise in Texas, to his everlasing embarrassment. And I have no doubt this episode is embarrassing to Nikki Haley.

The executive order route by Perry was in order to expedite the opt out, is what I understood.

Incorrect: that the Legislature had to override. No, it didn’t come to that. The whole thing was stopped before they needed to do that. It was the voice of the people, contacting their reps, demanding it be stopped, that Perry heard, before a vote was held.


14 posted on 09/19/2011 9:17:48 AM PDT by txrangerette ("...HOLD TO THE TRUTH; SPEAK WITHOUT FEAR." - Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: perfect_rovian_storm

Good points!


133 posted on 09/20/2011 7:45:42 AM PDT by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson