There is no ‘logic’ in arguments that accept falsehoods as fact, and that is the core of your posting style.
“There is no ‘logic’ in arguments that accept falsehoods as fact, and that is the core of your posting style.”
All of which you know by ESP, I guess??? Just like the Obot, Dr. Ken Noisewater, you are just trying to make your habit of criticizing stuff without reading it first SEEM logical. Well, you are NOT convincing me, and I just bet you are NOT convincing anybody else that you can do REMOTE SENSING to critique something.
Maybe you should change your screen name to “Editor-Mind Reader” since you are NOT actually SURVEYING stuff before you make your criticisms!!!
OH, Score 1 for Squeeky!!!
Tee Hee! Tee Hee!
“There is no ‘logic’ in arguments that accept falsehoods as fact, and that is the core of your posting style.”
Oh, PLUS, this is a completely false statement too. Because, when you are doing logic stuff, the falsity of a statement has NOTHING to do with the logic or illogic of it. You can have false premises, and still have logical deductions from those premises. WHICH, if you actually knew anything about LOGIC, you would already know.
I would give you a link to help you understand this concept, but you would probably not find it necessary to actually read it. Sooo, I know more about LOGIC than you do!!!
So There!!!