Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More Deaths Associated with HPV Vaccine
Dakota Voice. ^ | 9/21/07 | Staff

Posted on 09/17/2011 12:39:14 PM PDT by BarnacleCenturion

From Lifesite.net:

As of May 11, 2007, the 1,637 adverse vaccination reactions reported to the FDA via the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) included 371 serious reactions. Of the 42 women who received the vaccine while pregnant, 18 experienced side effects ranging from spontaneous abortion to fetal abnormalities. Side effects published by Merck & Co. warn the public about potential pain, fever, nausea, dizziness and itching after receiving the vaccine. Indeed, 77% of the adverse reactions reported are typical side effects to vaccinations. But other more serious side effects reported include paralysis, Bells Palsy, Guillain-Barre Syndrome, and seizures.

Judicial Watch informed LifeSiteNews.com that a subsequent request for information on adverse reactions to the HPV vaccine, covering the period from May 2007 to September 2007, found that an additional 1800 adverse reactions have been reported, including more deaths. Exactly how many more deaths will be released in the coming days, Judicial Watch’s Dee Grothe informed LifeSiteNews.com.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: perry; perry2012
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-160 next last
To: shankbear
How many deaths are attributable to aspirin every year??

Damn few in comparison to this vaccine. They make 40,000 tons of aspirin each year.

The worst trouble is Reyes syndrome in kids, which had 1207 cases over the 17 years 1981-1997, or less than a hundred a year to cover millions of doses.

When the HPV vaccine becomes as well understood as aspirin, the hubbub might die down. But it isn't that well known now.

121 posted on 09/18/2011 10:56:37 AM PDT by slowhandluke (It's hard to be cynical enough in this age.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion

This a junk article.
Go to the VAERS site, enter HPV4, and read the reports yourself. Not a single one of the deaths has been because of the vaccine. Anyone can make a report on this site, the vetting comes after it’s posted.

http://wwwn.medalerts.org/vaersdb/index.phpb

Here’s the CDC report on the out and out liesblike those in your article.

http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/vaccines/hpv/gardasil.html


122 posted on 09/18/2011 11:04:44 AM PDT by hocndoc (http://WingRight.orgI've got a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.Patrol the border 2 control)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

Wrong. Learn your ethics.
The vaccines are given for the protection of the person who receives the vaccine.

One reason for the delay in recommending Gardasil for boys was the fact that males don’t get cervical cancer. When the FDA took into account the prevention of rectal, oral, and lung cancers and the prevention of genital warts, with their recurrance and treatment, it was decided to add the recommendation.

That is not to say that governments and policy will not or cannot abuse the vaccine mandates. In much of the third world, people were forcibly vaccinated against smallpox, at times, at gunpoint.


123 posted on 09/18/2011 11:11:44 AM PDT by hocndoc (http://WingRight.orgI've got a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.Patrol the border 2 control)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven

Actually, some women received the vaccine after a negative pregnancy test. Possibly the reason the test was negative was that the pregnancy was abnormal - or possibly it was too early in the pregnancy - to measure Human Chorionic Gonadatropin.

The miscarriages and birth defects were at the same statistical numbers found in the population that is not vaccinated.


124 posted on 09/18/2011 11:17:15 AM PDT by hocndoc (http://WingRight.orgI've got a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.Patrol the border 2 control)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: donna

Donna, you called the HPV vaccine the ‘Skanky girl vaccine.”

And the Pap smear is . . .?
Do you get a pap smear? The only reason to get a pap smear is to look for cellular changes that are due to HPV in 99% of the cases.


125 posted on 09/18/2011 11:21:10 AM PDT by hocndoc (http://WingRight.orgI've got a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.Patrol the border 2 control)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion

It was never mandated until Virginia did so recently.

There’s an opt out procedure in Texas, and this was made easier in the Governor’s Executive February, 2007 Executive orderthat was over ruled by the Legislature by special law, so it would have worked for Gardasil, just as it does for girls who get their measles/mumps/rubella vaccines at 11 - 12 years old.

It covers pregnancy as a medical reason - even in 11-12 year old girls mentioned in the 2007 EO.


126 posted on 09/18/2011 11:28:09 AM PDT by hocndoc (http://WingRight.orgI've got a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.Patrol the border 2 control)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion

OH come on. I have to be careful what meds I take because I sometimes have “bad” reactions..

I don’t go around yelling the sky is falling everyone run for cover. There are bad meds in the neighborhood.

EVERY human is DIFFERENT. What I take someone else may not be able to tolerate.

This is what our society has come to. If everyone doesn’t have the very same result, then it has to be stopped.
Sort of like schools, everyone is the same no A’s no F’s.

I think some need to get a clue as to how medicine works, success and failure. Miracles and no miracles.

Now the fact that Bachmann is getting Donations from drug companies that are competing for the Gardisil market makes her even LESS credible if there is such a thing. Plus Merck hasn’t given her any money. Bet if they gave her a nice chunk of cash she would shut up immediately. Crony Capitalism?


127 posted on 09/18/2011 11:41:27 AM PDT by Marty62 (Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Since the vaccine is only for non-sexually active girls.

HOW did these WOMEN Qualify to get the vaccine? Something stinks in that, need more info.


128 posted on 09/18/2011 12:09:53 PM PDT by Marty62 (Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc

As we tally up the medical procedures, cost and suffering due to promiscuous behavior, it becomes clear why the government wants to sexualize our children and take over health care, doesn’t it?


129 posted on 09/18/2011 12:19:06 PM PDT by donna (This is what happens when America is no longer a Christian nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: donna

You didn’t answer, either question:

What is the Pap smear, if (as you said) the HPV vaccine is the “Skanky Girl vaccine?”

I’ll rephrase this, in light of the second question, are women who make appointments to get their pap smears admitting that they are “Skanky?”


130 posted on 09/18/2011 12:31:36 PM PDT by hocndoc (http://WingRight.orgI've got a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.Patrol the border 2 control)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: donna

No, a kid isn’t going to get a false sense of security from a vaccine. If a kid goes out and becomes a “skank,” it’s the parent’s fault for not educating their children. But hey, I suppose if the parent does educate and the child does it anyway, the child deserves cancer and disease.


131 posted on 09/18/2011 12:32:50 PM PDT by benjibrowder (For Neda. May God bless those fighting for freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Thanks.

Honestly, I simply haven’t made up my mind on this one yet. I figure if there was enough truly solid evidence, it’d be pulled...as you pointed out, to think otherwise is getting into conspiracy a bit.

So far I’m mostly leaning towards keep it available, not mandatory.


132 posted on 09/18/2011 12:40:04 PM PDT by Fire_on_High (Gohmert ROCKS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: George from New England
Silence, no stats to support after 3 years it seems

Average age at onset of cervical cancer is 45. If vaccinating teenaged girls prevents cervical cancer, the effect will not be detectable for 30-40 years.

133 posted on 09/18/2011 12:40:44 PM PDT by Jim Noble (To live peacefully with credit-based consumption and fiat money, men would have to be angels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion
How many schoolgirls are forced by the government to take aspirin each year?

The exact same number that are forced to take Gardasil. Zero.
134 posted on 09/18/2011 12:56:00 PM PDT by DRey (Perry/Rubio 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: donna
Heather Burcham was not a "skanky girl."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIsWB348z-Q&feature=youtu.be


135 posted on 09/18/2011 1:01:44 PM PDT by DRey (Perry/Rubio 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: George from New England
Silence, no stats to support after 3 years it seems.

I believe we have a winner for the dumbest post ever on FR!

Do you really expect 14-year-olds to have cervical cancer? Of course you don't. Those 11-year-old girls lucky enough to have been vaccinated will be part of the pool in 15-20 years that lower the incidence of cervical cancer. Three years. Good grief. If this level of short-sightedness (I'll be nice) is what good people like Rick Perry are up against, it's really no wonder this country is in the shape its in.
136 posted on 09/18/2011 1:05:38 PM PDT by DRey (Perry/Rubio 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DRey

How do you know?


137 posted on 09/18/2011 1:20:29 PM PDT by donna (This is what happens when America is no longer a Christian nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc

Your thinking is the same old brainwashed line: legalize prostitution so the government can regulate health care for disease control, pack the schools with pedophiles to teach children how to use condoms for disease control, force all pregnant women to be checked for HIV for disease control, push breast exams (instead of telling the truth about abortion) for disease control, pass out “safe” needles to users for disease control . . .

Endless government control (and out-of-control medical costs) instead of just telling the truth: Skanky behavior gives us diseases.


138 posted on 09/18/2011 1:37:40 PM PDT by donna (This is what happens when America is no longer a Christian nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Fire_on_High
So far I’m mostly leaning towards keep it available, not mandatory.

I'm with you on that. Unfortunately, I live in the ONE state in the union where it is still "mandatory" with parental opt-out.

My kids didn't have to get it though.

139 posted on 09/18/2011 1:41:30 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: donna

The burden of proof is yours.


140 posted on 09/18/2011 2:10:33 PM PDT by DRey (Perry/Rubio 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson