The original poster, who is a Palin supporter and states so in their signature, accused Rick Perry of supporting TARP by some sort of flimsy deductive reasoning.
When confronted by concrete evidence that Sarah Palin, who he supports, literally supported TARP after it was signed, he makes excuses for her while not excusing Perry’s non-support of TARP.
That’s why Sarah Palin was mentioned in this thread.
No. I think it is about exactly what I said it was about, how you can twist words and misrepresent letters and claim something that isn’t true. I simply used an article accusing Palin the exact same way to illustrate my point.