Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney
But it's backwards!.....It should have been an 'opt-in' clause for those parents who wished to have it for their children...

..rather than an 'opt-out' for conscientious parents who felt their rights were being assaulted!

There's power in the way ideas are presented.....!

296 posted on 09/16/2011 8:42:24 AM PDT by Guenevere (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies ]


To: Guenevere
It should have been an 'opt-in' clause for those parents who wished to have it for their children

None of our other required vaccines are done that way, why is this one required to be different?

How would an opt-in work? How is it different than no requirement at all, just as it is today or before?

297 posted on 09/16/2011 8:47:47 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson