Doesn’t matter really in this case because no one was immunized. There were no side effects that affected anyone. There were not even any little pinpricks in anyone’s arm.
There was nothing except a potentially bad decision that was stopped long before it was ever implemented.
And the decision itself could well be seen as a fair response to the then current understanding of HPV by an over-protective parent....that was stopped.
It goes to Perry’s character as a decision-maker, and it does point to his Big Government solution to what should be a parent/child decision, and it does matter if there were ulterior motives in implementing this.