Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Just mythoughts

“IT was Governor Perry executing a tax increase without seeking the citizens representation.”

Again, this was to save lives of young girls. They can’t even vote so who is to deny them the right to be protected from cancer?


101 posted on 09/13/2011 12:30:41 AM PDT by ari-freedom (It's time for Obama to get a downgrade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: ari-freedom
Again, this was to save lives of young girls. They can’t even vote so who is to deny them the right to be protected from cancer?

There is another way for young girls to be protected. IF they can be taught how to put a condom on a cucumber they can also be taught that IF they put that cucumber in their body they can get cancer.

107 posted on 09/13/2011 12:43:17 AM PDT by Just mythoughts (Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

To: ari-freedom

With all due respect to many on this thread,

It seems that too many put their blind trust in the FDA and CDC with regards to Gardisil, just to protect their candidate. It is a little hypocritical since this same thought process is critical to other government agencies when it fits their argument.

The fact is, Gardisil is not a good vaccine. Many of the initial negative findings were covered up by Merck. It causes higher rates of miscarriage and premature abortion. It seems to reactivate the HPV virus in those where the virus is actually dormant leading to lesions and increased chance of cancer and fertility problems later in life, and many other reactions. This information is out there for anyone who dares to challenge the government accounting of reactions to this vaccine. Not to mention, the adjucvants that accompanies the antibodies are potent toxins that disrupt the immune system, brain, nervous system and endocrine system.

During our lifetime we get cancer approximately six times without even knowing it, because, for most of us, our bodies deal with it. Science needs to investigate why we do not get cancer, instead of why we do. It is there, where the solution lies.

It is the toxic load that is placed upon the human body that causes disease and prolonged illness. Why then, mandate to our young, the injection of more toxins, to prevent disease? If you want to mandate something worth while, just mandate good hygiene, sanitation, and removal of toxins in packaged food and on perishable food, in the soil and the seeds. Basically, mandate personal responsibility and self respect. Would we be less free, then?

A mandate of any kind, especially paid for by others without their consent, is not proper for a conservative to propose, let alone be okay with it, just to justify a favorite candidate or position. If you really look at all the hard data, many vaccines cause more pain and suffering along with financial cost to our economy, then they do prevent illness better than our own bodies.

Our children deserve better. Huge Monetary transactions and political positioning should be condemned when it used to manipulate society into fear and blind allegiance. We all, in the end, become less free. Hey, maybe it is okay after all, because in the end, it helps to control the worlds population.

I am not a troll, I am a Patriot, Health Advocate, Respected Member of My Community and A Concerned Citizen.


135 posted on 09/13/2011 2:20:03 AM PDT by mazz44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson