To: SanFranDan
Why would anyone subscribe to it in the first place?
2 posted on
09/12/2011 7:50:50 AM PDT by
Enterprise
("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
To: SanFranDan
remember: NY Times also endorsed David Weprin
3 posted on
09/12/2011 7:51:05 AM PDT by
ari-freedom
(It's time for Obama to get a downgrade.)
To: SanFranDan
that is liable to bankrupt them
4 posted on
09/12/2011 7:51:35 AM PDT by
SF_Redux
(Sarah stands for accountablility and personal responsiblity, democrats can't live with that)
To: SanFranDan
Why would he have had one to begin with?
5 posted on
09/12/2011 7:51:45 AM PDT by
Grunthor
(If you are emotionally attached to any politician you are a light weight, a mental midget, a moron.)
To: SanFranDan
Good For Rumsfield. More people should show that the partisan NYT is barely good enough for bird cage paper.
To: SanFranDan
Rumsfeld cancels subscription to New York Times The news here is that a guy like Rumsfeld would subscribe to that square of toilet tissue in the first place.
To: SanFranDan
If the NYT sinply published the crossword puzzle and slashed their subscrition price they would be in the black.
13 posted on
09/12/2011 7:58:16 AM PDT by
Huskrrrr
To: SanFranDan
Hey! Keep it going Pinch! Soon Bill Schulz of Red Eye can represent you with a single sheet of folded paper!
16 posted on
09/12/2011 7:59:35 AM PDT by
LRS
("This is silly! It can't be! It canha't be!!" "Oh yes it is! I said you wouldn't know the joint.")
To: SanFranDan
To: SanFranDan
Use it to line the bird cage — I understand that — but this must really be bad.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson