Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Recovering Ex-hippie

>>You can opt out.<<

First, I homeschool.
Second, why should I have to fill out a form to ‘opt out’ of any decision about my child. Santorum had it right, why wasn’t it an ‘opt in’ instead?


915 posted on 09/12/2011 6:32:28 PM PDT by netmilsmom (Happiness is a choice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 850 | View Replies ]


To: netmilsmom

Read upthread. It was opt out so that it could be covered.

Geez.


984 posted on 09/12/2011 6:38:23 PM PDT by Winstons Julia (when liberals rant, it's called free speech; when conservatives vent, it's called hate speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 915 | View Replies ]

To: netmilsmom

whoopie for you.

If you care about your kid, you fill out a form.
Perry already had answered this.


985 posted on 09/12/2011 6:38:33 PM PDT by Recovering Ex-hippie (GOD BLESS AMERICA !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 915 | View Replies ]

To: netmilsmom
Santorum had it right, why wasn’t it an ‘opt in’ instead?

I see where you are coming from. I homeschooled all three of mine until they went off to college. I home schooled because I would not give my children to the government to raise. It is THEIR school when we do that, and I would not pass one lick of my rights to them.

However, why was it not just an opt in? Here is what I understand: Perry chose it as a mandatory, opt out vaccination because .. if a vaccine is considered mandatory, it is covered by insurance companies. An opt out made it available without the $150.00 to $160.00 cost per child. If a parent wanted it, it was covered by insurance. If not, they could opt out.

If the vaccine has been set up as a recommended or suggested preventative health practice, which would have been handled as an opt in, and the parents had WANTED to have their children receive the health vaccinations, the parents would have had to have paid the total cost of vaccine on their own without the help of the insurance company payment.

The opt out created a situation where the parents who didn't want the vaccine could opt out but those parents who did would have it covered by their health insurance.

Whether you like the vaccine or not, it is good to know why Perry set it up that way. He didn't want the parents to have to pay the high costs on their own which an "opt in" would have done.

1,145 posted on 09/12/2011 6:49:41 PM PDT by casinva (IMAGINE: PERRY, PALIN, AND CAIN STANDING SIDE BY SIDE IN THE GENERAL ELECTION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 915 | View Replies ]

To: netmilsmom

netmilmom, YOU and YOUR kids aren’t the target of gardasil, nor am I and MY kids, nor are most FReepers. The vaccine is needed for sexually active adolescents. Most of them don’t have parents who are terribly involved in their lives.

Do you think for one minute that those parents would ‘go to the trouble’ of filling out an opt-in form? You and I would readily have opted out, no questions asked. But WE are involved in our kids’ lives.

Gardasil is not for, as Michelle Bachmann keeps saying, “innocent little girls.” It’s for sexually active 11-12+ year olds. Anyone who thinks that many innocent-looking middle school girls aren’t sexually active is keeping their head in the sand.


1,288 posted on 09/12/2011 7:02:55 PM PDT by EDINVA ( Jimmy McMillan '12: because RENT'S TOO DAMN HIGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 915 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson