I can’t believe the sorry reasoning...if that’s what it can even be called.
I have made the point several times...if Perry raised huge sums of money, total, from many, many, many sources, then no single, ordinary sized contribution is meaningful in terms of being “bought”.
That is true reasoning.
It is pathetic reasoning to claim that anyone who makes the point that 5 thou is so small in the scheme of things it doesn’t buy the donor anything, is thereby stating that they could be bought for a greater sum.
Pitiful.
We who truly reason are presenting to those who aren’t in reasoning mode due to their political committments, the facts. The facts are, an ordinary sized contribution within a huge sum of multiple donations is - on its face - not capable of buying anything.
In return, we get...oh, but you’re admitting a larger contribution WOULD buy you.
No, we’re reasoning from obvious facts that people such as yourself have happily ignored in pursuit of political interests.
Tx...all your verbage fails to mention the facts that Perry is quite well known for being a “pay to play” man. It’s not a secret or something which has to be found out. It simply is. Therefore Bachmans statements referring to that end is not far fetched....
Further you have attempted to elevate Perry supporters as ONLY those who have “reasoning abilities”....that is carrying the liberal mantra of the elitist mindset.
Many Freepers, who do not support your candidate, are certainly more than capable of “reasoning”....you’re apparently confused about those wo have elected to believe other “facts” then the ones Perry supporters present....and that’s his history of “pay to play”.
So yes, of course if the price is right Perry will be bought.....and he is not alone in doing so.