What Bachmann said is a 100% accurate description of the appearance of a conflict of interest. Since laws allow such conflicts of interest, it's up to each voter to decide whether the conflict of interest was improper.
And candidates in any primary will always make criticisms of opponents that the other party can use in the general election. Has always been that way and always will be.
Well then she should have gone after Romney on RomneyCare which is 100% a law in place.
it may have been an accurate description of the appearance of a conflict of interest, but she alleged he basically took a bribe - just not right. And if she was going to throw out allegations, she could have thrown out hundreds against obama.
“And candidates in any primary will always make criticisms of opponents that the other party can use in the general election. Has always been that way and always will be. “
That’s why incumbancy is a huge advantage. 0 is gathering amunition at these debates.