Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LuvFreeRepublic

Just saw it. Sarah defended Michele and spoke very negatively about Perry’s executive order on Gardisil. Says the drug companies were pushing Gardisil on her when she was Governor. Wow!


1,372 posted on 09/12/2011 7:14:05 PM PDT by miss marmelstein (Run, Sarah, Run! Please!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1343 | View Replies ]


To: miss marmelstein

I am curious as to your honest reaction to Gov. Palin’s answer to Greta’s question regarding whether she’ll run or not?


1,383 posted on 09/12/2011 7:15:34 PM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1372 | View Replies ]

To: miss marmelstein
Hee hee...Greta tries every which way she can to get an answer from Sarah regarding if she's running, still engaged in the process, giving up, drop dead date to enter, etc.

Sarah says she's engaged but not letting the media force her decision.

1,394 posted on 09/12/2011 7:17:10 PM PDT by Jane Long (Soli Deo Gloria!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1372 | View Replies ]

To: miss marmelstein

She is right about that. The drug companies, when they have a new vaccine, have to push states to put them on the mandatory lists. Otherwise the insurance companies don’t cover it, people don’t know about it and can’t afford it, and they don’t make money on it.

I don’t blame the drug companies. They make a good product, that is helpful to a large number of women. The problem is the laws that decide which vaccines are paid for and which are not.

Palin should be attacking the idea of having the state government determine what drugs are covered by insurance companies, so that the drug companies are forced to lobby the state government to get their drugs added to the list.

Someone else noted that Alaska does have Gardisil on the list, but not on a mandatory vaccine list, but still putting it where insurance companies have to cover it. I’m guessing that made the drug companies happy enough.

But it’s not “crony capitalism” for people, or corporations, to lobby the government to minimize it’s impact on them. The problem isn’t even that politicians need money to get elected, and people give money to politicians who do what they want (we all send money to candidates who will do what we want them to do, so they are being bribed to listen to us).

The problem is a state (or federal) government so powerful that it makes laws that effect us so greatly that we have to lobby the state to defend our interests. You think the drug companies WANT to have to kiss up to politicians to get their products put on lists to get insurance companies to cover them? Well, probably they do, because since the state offers that “service”, it is the only real way to get an advantage.

And it certainly isn’t that somebody got a $5000 donation from a drug company, and somehow that made them put a vaccine on the list.


1,863 posted on 09/12/2011 8:46:59 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1372 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson