Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: free me

This is nonsense. Rick Perry, in his first National debate, acquitted himself quite well. He was the one who had the most to lose, and he held his own against the snarky onslaught of the odious duo of DIM moderators, and against Mitt, who was far better than in 2008.
IMO there are only three real possible candidates: Mitt, Perry, and Sarah. The battle now is between Mitt and Perry, until or if Sarah jumps in.
I think Sarah will be the stronger true conservative candidate with less baggage.
We can all agree that any one if them is a giant compared to the diminishing midget that was obama.


67 posted on 09/07/2011 11:43:32 PM PDT by Cincinna ( *** NOBAMA 2012 ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cincinna

If you are right then Perry is the nominee, I don’t see Mitt having a snowball’s chance in South Carolina without which no one has won the nomination since the state held its first primary and Sarah seems to be out. I have as yet seen no evidence to indicate that the WOMEN of America have any interest in putting a woman in the white house, if they did we would be moaning about president Clinton again rather than president Obama.


118 posted on 09/08/2011 5:41:00 AM PDT by RipSawyer (Trying to reason with a liberal is like teaching algebra to a tomcat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson