Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WOSG
If she has decided to run but decided not to tell people, even when given keynote platforms for speeches in Iowa, then that is whacked. There’s a reasonable limit to coyness.

It is even worse than that. If she has decided to run and has not informed Fox News of that fact, knowing that they have a policy of suspending or terminating commentators that are running for public office, then she is taking money from them under false pretenses. That is dishonest and unethical.

So the choices appear to be a) she is indecisive and and can't make up her mind; b) she has decided not to run, but has not told her supporters in order to stay in limelight; or c) she has decided to run, but has kept it to herself so as to keep getting her $1M/yr salary until the very last minute. Indecisive, unethical or dishonest? You decide.

102 posted on 09/07/2011 11:33:45 AM PDT by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: CA Conservative

Not unlike a governor running for reelection telling the electorate he will not be running for president...


109 posted on 09/07/2011 11:38:13 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: CA Conservative
Indecisive, unethical or dishonest? You decide.

So this is what it has come down to: Sarah Palin is either an idiot, a crook, or a liar?

What, no "All of the above?"

Words fail me.

118 posted on 09/07/2011 11:46:59 AM PDT by LaybackLenny (All hail Her Royal Highness Sarah, Queen of The Hobbits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: CA Conservative
So the choices appear to be a) she is indecisive and and can't make up her mind; b) she has decided not to run, but has not told her supporters in order to stay in limelight; or c) she has decided to run, but has kept it to herself so as to keep getting her $1M/yr salary until the very last minute. Indecisive, unethical or dishonest? You decide.

Thanks, you are probably helping to unseal some eyes around here. I'd like nothing better than to see Palin inaugurated, but the writing on the wall doesn't offer much hope of that.

Nevertheless, she deserves the benefit of the doubt and a fourth possibility: decided not to run but waiting to make sure Perry doesn't fall on his face coming out of the gate. Maybe she hasn't finished reading 24,000 emails of his! ;)

148 posted on 09/07/2011 12:11:11 PM PDT by Lady Lucky (Heavy the head that wears the tiara.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: CA Conservative
It is even worse than that. If she has decided to run and has not informed Fox News of that fact, knowing that they have a policy of suspending or terminating commentators that are running for public office, then she is taking money from them under false pretenses. That is dishonest and unethical.

Nonsense.

Palin is free to announce when she wants to announce and Fox is free to dismiss her when they think that she is running.

I'll tell you what is unethical.

Perry taking a public paycheck to be a full time governor and Perry running for president, a full time responsibility.

220 posted on 09/07/2011 3:03:59 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson