Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cripplecreek

Obviously something has to be done but it must be done carefully.


It’s like a doctor convincing a patient that in order to survive, he must remove a limb, or administer poisonous levels of radiation or chemicals with terrible side effects.

A smart leader helps the voter understand that the system they fear losing is in danger of wholesale destruction, and they must accept some reforms in order to be able to rely on it.

“Don’t kill the golden goose.”

“We must rescue Social Security from decades of Congressional neglect and irresponsibility. That will mean some sacrifice from those who need it the least (younger would-be retirees and wealthy retirees) in order for it to be there for those who need it the most.”


28 posted on 09/07/2011 8:25:21 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Are you better off now than you were four trillion dollars ago?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Beelzebubba

My idea for “reforming” social security starts with completely unrelated regulation and ends with totally private individual choice retirement funds.


33 posted on 09/07/2011 8:31:45 AM PDT by cripplecreek (A vote for Amnesty is a vote for a Permenant Democrat majority. ..Choose well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson