I am for a secured border. Whether it is a fenced border, I have not studied that particular issue very much at all.
As for in-state tuition for illegals, if I were a Texas resident, I would have been vehemently opposed to it, just was I was when I was in CA and such a policy was being proposed.
If Perry proposes nation-wide policy for in-state tuition for illegals, I would be the first to fight against him.
Of course, I am for legal immigration. I actally wish we as a country better assimilate legal immigrants and turn them into “right” thinking people. I am a RARE RARE species. I hate for it to be true for long.
Your response is not “RARE RARE” at all, but demonstrates reasonable and common sense. That being the case, what is it about Perry, given his “no fence” and “in-state tuition” positions, that’s so appealing as opposed to Palin?