Posted on 09/05/2011 6:22:42 AM PDT by Kaslin
When you look at the average price of gold over time, there are several interesting trends that emerge. Investors buy gold as a hedge against inflation and, over a very long period of time, that holds up. More often, investors are buying gold as insurance in a crisis; as a safe harbor investment in times of uncertainty.
Let’s start by looking at the average price of gold between 1979 and 1989. I’m using average prices to even out the parabolic demand periods which can throw off analysis. The data comes from the World Gold Council.
In the late 70s and early 80s the U.S. was still trying to fight off the effects of stagflation and a recession. The crisis spurred a rise in gold prices, which is to be expected, but then prices dropped quickly back to near normal for that time period and traded in a relatively narrow range, dancing around the $400 mark for nearly 20 years.
Compare that to average gold prices between 2000 and 2010 (next page).
The difference is immediately obvious. In the late 70s we had a crisis, we recovered and went on our merry way, but something changed in the late 90s. According to the price of gold, we entered a period of prolonged economic crisis.
I would maintain that, starting in the late 90s, the world entered a period of permanent economic instability. It was not as obvious in the 2000’s when the economic effects in the U.S. were being masked by an artificial boom in the housing market and two wars funded by deficit spending. The collapse of the mortgage industry and banking system brought home the ugly reality with a bang. Using the average price of gold as a baseline, you can see that what we experienced in 2008 could be predicted from the trend line.
The unemployment rate we’re seeing today is, I believe, a new reality. Where is the growth going to come from to spur the demand for hiring and who is going pay for it? There is not any real driver for sustainable growth I can see, either in the U.S. or Europe, which I believe partially explains the simultaneous panic we see on both sides of the Atlantic.
China has managed to stave off most of the effects of a global slowdown by massive infrastructure investments; new roads, high speed rail, and construction projects on a grand scale. The Chinese are putting so much money into infrastructure it’s straining their bond market just trying to pay for it all. They can’t keep that up forever; no economy can survive with the government as the only permanent source of demand. The Chinese also help themselves by engaging in massive currency manipulation and protectionist trade policies.
The governments of Europe and the U.S. are caught in a bind between a lack of sustainable growth and mountains of sovereign debt. The funny money policies of central banks can stave off collapse, for a while, but zero percent interest simply cannot be maintained indefinitely. In the U.S., traditionally the global economic leader, we’re paralyzed by political gridlock. The world can’t count on the U.S. to find a path out of the quagmire and they’re scared.
As far as the future of the price of gold goes, it may be above that trend line now, but not excessively. The world desperately needs money that is not subject to currency manipulation and, historically anyway, that’s been gold and silver. So look for the price of gold to continue on the trend until we either find a sustainable driver for growth, experience a global economic collapse, or a world-wide revolution that pushes the economic reset button.
Chris Poindexter, Senior Writer, National Gold Group, Inc
F*ing simple
the dysfunctional will inherit the world first.
Yes, but they will riot before they will work for their needs. Bring it on.
We have had a tremendous amount of wealth destruction resulting in reduced demand which is the only thing that could keep gold down long term. Short term, a GOP all around win in 2012 could free up a lot of money in gold ETFs, mining companies, to flow back into equities.
Gold prices are governed by supply and demand of the free market (like tulip bulbs in 16th century Holland), not by cartels like oil and diamonds.
What will keep gold prices down long term is the fact that gold can be produced, marketed and sold profitably at $400 per oz and that excess profits will eventually bring in ever more producers and eventually gold prices will reflect the highest incremental cost of producing and marketing gold plus a reasonable profit for return on investment for the producers and sellers of this commodity.
That's how a free capitalistic market operates.
That speculators are presently willing to pay 400% - 500% more than its long term intrinsic economic value is simply the next greater fool theory in operation.
Just don't be holding the bag when this bubble bursts..
Gold prices, like everything else, are of course driven by supply and demand. But one must recognize the enormous explosion of the central banks’ balance sheets and the money supply which devalues the paper currency. We are not seeing across the board inflation as in the 70s and early 80s at least not yet, but when inflation does arrive (because of economic expansion) it would be easy to see gold prices rise further. It is very difficult to assign an intrinsic economic value with unstable fiat currencies over time. Other markers of value such as oil, land food commodities have fluctuated wildly and cannot be considered stable units of value. Historically, the precious metals, have been the best measure of value. The only thing that fiat currency has
going for it is legal tender status, which of course is crucial.
"The real price of every thing, what every thing really costs to the man who wants to acquire it, is the toil and trouble of acquiring it...
But though labour be the real measure of the exchangeable value of all commodities, it is not that by which their value is commonly estimated...
Every commodity, besides, is more frequently exchanged for, and thereby compared with, other commodities than with labour." - Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, 1776
"The real price of every thing, what every thing really costs to the man who wants to acquire it, is the toil and trouble of acquiring it...
But though labour be the real measure of the exchangeable value of all commodities, it is not that by which their value is commonly estimated...
Every commodity, besides, is more frequently exchanged for, and thereby compared with, other commodities than with labour." - Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, 1776
The problem with your theory (Adam Smith’s) is that central banks the world over are purchasing gold as a hedge to their wealth. Things are changing and actually the world is trending back to the gold standard by proxy.
Maybe a better way to view the situation is-How much gold(not currency) is your labor worth?
Right now ww are seeing the currency bubble bursting. The reason gold is high is because the supply of currency and the size of central bank balance sheets have increased enormously.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.