I posted this to you on another thread. Since you didn’t bother to answer, I thought you had gone away. Lucky me, you are stil here. So please answer these very basic questions.
Sunday, September 04, 2011 3:34:43 AM · 45 of 45
MestaMachine to hocndoc
So he’s not a statist...in his book...real strong believer in state’s rights...then how come everytime anyone says anything about his support of illegals, it’s all fed gov’s fault because they won’t do what Sheriff Joe does in Arizona every day? And how come he “symbolically” billed fed gov for illegals in Texas jails? Why not bill Mexico? THAT’S where they came from. While he’s at it, why not bill Mexico for their education and medical care?
And why did he change his mind on state’s rights about gay marriage for purely political points and sign the NOM pledge?
This is hypocrisy and Bachmann is as guilty of it as he is. If either one of them would have STARTED OUT by stating reasonably that marriage should be covered by fed gov so that the same rules applied for every state because it doesn’t make sense for MA to recognize gay marriage and if those people travel to a state that doesn’t, it is chaos, it would be a whole other thing. But no, they didn’t do that. So were they being dishonest then, or are they being dishonest now?
Can’t say one thing, do another, and think people don’t notice.
Looks like someone doesn't know what duties the Federal government is supposed to even do...
I'd recommend reading the Constitution. You'll find that, while most of the cr@p the Federal government does is unconstitutional...
...Article 4 Section 4 states:
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic Violence.