That’s all these libertarian fools have is assumptions. They base their statements on what they believe will happen and ignore what history has already shown us. This whole argument is an exercise wasted time.
Teaching a libertarian or liberal to use logic is like trying to teach a pig to sing. It wastes your time and annoys the pig.
I notice you tend to make broad-brush (and consistently perjorative) statements about libertarians and libertarianism.
From where I stand, you're not any closer to being right than he is.
Exactly where in the Constitution can I find what you seem to want to see, that is, the authority granted government to prohibit We, the People, from owning, possessing, selling or ingesting anything we so desire? Please enlighten me. Because if, per the Ninth and tenth Amendments, it’s not specifically enumerated, GOVERNMENT DOES NOT HAVE THAT AUTHORITY. Unless you’re talking the same emanations and penumbras that gave us Roe v Wade. In which case you are not one whit better than Hairy Reid, Nancy Pel-lousy or Barak H. Obummer. So which is it? Are we a LIMITED GOVERNMENT CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC, resting on the authority originating with and loaned by We, the People, or are we whatever suits your control freak purposes at this moment?