Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hocndoc
He met with an organized group of people...a national organization...that espouses in its charter the dismantling of the soveriegn borders of this nation and creating a seperate nation for mexican and spanish descent individuals out of parts of California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas.

They are racist and they are enemies of the Republic.

That is why a Governor should not meet with them. Not because some of his citiznes happen to belong, but because of what they advocate. He should have refused to meet with them until they change their charter, and thereby exposed them for what they are.

Instead, he pandered to them.

No, I cannot see any American governor meeting with such an organization. That's like in World War II having a governor meeting with the American Nazi Party because a number of his citizens belonged.

It may not be declared...but we are at war with groups like La Raza because they openly advocate the destruction of our Republic.

I have no problem with the Governor meeting with any groups of citizens...as long as they do not advocate the overthrow of our nation. Anyhow, that is simply my opinion.

I understand the political reason for it...and for ignoring what they represent because you do not want to upset other Hispanics who are not aware of the details of La Raza and have been taken in by their propoganda. What was missed was an opportunity to expose La Raza for what it is in the hopes of educating those same Hispanics who, IMHO, if they knew what La Raza advocates, would also not want to be involved with them.

I kknow there is political risk in that...but true statesmen and leaders take risks to do what is right. In this particular instance, Perry did not. Clearly, in other areas he is willing...but it seems to all be just a little too politically calculated.

Anyhow, I do support him in those other areas, and I do support his willingness to get serious on the border...though even there he seams to scoff at building the fence, which is the first thing I would do, follolwed in quick order by having it patrolled by the National Guard.

165 posted on 08/29/2011 9:34:04 AM PDT by Jeff Head (Liberty is not free. Never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Head

As President, he’ll have to meet with leaders of groups (nations) who have promised to obliterate our country.

Texas doesn’t have all the money in the world. The Feds should pay for National defense.

How much of your land do you want cut off from the US by a river? Our border is 1200 miles of the 2000 mile border with Mexico and it’s a river that winds back and forth. It’s not a straight piece of land like in New Mexico, Arizona or California.

The fence that has been built along the river is straight, because of the logistics of following the actual border in the Rio Grand. It cuts some homes and land off from the US, divides farm and ranch land and cuts livestock and irrigation off from the river.

In the meantime, we are spending some of our own Texas funds to put “boots on the ground” for border security in the form of Texas Rangers and DPS personnel.

However, the Feds should be paying for those National Guards - and they are paying for some. It’s just that 1200 National Guard troops were deployed by Obama but Texas only got 250 of them.


178 posted on 08/29/2011 10:47:22 AM PDT by hocndoc (http://WingRight.org I've got a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.https://www.rickperry.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson