Yes, he certainly shielded the facts from light of day, in his post.
Cut, Cap and Balance was supported for its provisions to cut, cap and balance. The debt ceiling part was anthema but was the trade off to pass the right policies going forward.
Whereas, the Debt Ceiling Bill, which Perry opposed, raised the debt ceiling but failed to put in place the right policies going forward.
But his post pretended that Perry was for the debt ceiling going up and shielded the truth that Perry was for cutting, capping and balancing, and was against the awful Debt Ceiling so-called compromise bill.
Then, he blasted me for not knowing what he really meant, although he was the one who covered up the crucial facts in his original, accusatory post, which only blared that Perry supported raising the debt ceiling.
Given his history, he must feel pretty good about that sorry act, down there in Mom’s basement...
Nonsense.
“Cut, cap and balance” was a debt ceiling raise. $2.4 TRILLION dollars worth.
You can pretend it wasn’t all you want, but it won’t change the facts.