Replies

>>>In 2009, Ron Paul out earmarked Nancy Pelosi while stating public funding of crap was a “tax rebate.”<<<

That is a smear. You took it completely out of context (as I explained to you and this thread many times). Where did you get your smear methods, from Chris Matthews?

That was mean of me. Maybe you are just too stupid understand the budget-earmarking process. If so, I apologize. (I admit, I did not understand it for a long time, because of the media, of course).

But you really should stop the smearing. It is unbecoming.

>>>Ron Paul has stated that 9/11 was America’s fault.<<<

You did not give any context, but no matter. The terrorists stated it was America’s fault. I guess Ron Paul believed them. This is, after all, a religious war, at least against us.

>>>Ron Paul criticized America on IslamnoNazi Iran’s state run televison station.<<<

I read it. It was pretty tame.

>>>Ron Paul has an endorsement of sorts from Code Pinko.<<<

And your point is? They are “anti-war” and Obama is not. Who’s left?

>>>Some of Ron Paul’s supporters are Neo-Confederates. Some are neo-Nazis. Some are 9/11 Truthers.<<<

As aforementioned, there are not a lot of choices. I’ll bet some of those also supported G.W. Bush, even Reagan.

>>>None of this is Conservative thought, therefore it’s wrong.<<<

I’ll admit it is not New-Conservative (Neo-Conservative) thought. But he never claimed that, to my knowledge. He is a traditional conservative, which you obviously do not understand.

>>>I will certainly do my best to make sure he doesn’t win the Republican nomination.<<<

We are still somewhat of a free country. Knock youself out. Give us another RINO.