>>>We went over this in the last thread, when the good doctor was spending federal funds on rehab clinics and “drop out reduction” programs. There’s no need to go over that again.<<<
No, we do, because you misrepresented what he did.
You conveniently failed to mention that, because of the insane way money is budgeted, whereby the entire amount of the budget is first authorized, and then individual “pieces” of that budget are targeted for this and that, whatever is left over goes to the executive branch, and Obama can spend it any damn well he pleases—to buy votes, to punish enemies, to reward friends,. . . anything.
You also failed to mention that Ron Paul wants ultimately that there be no expenditures that are not constitutionally authorized, and he wants the entire budget “earmarked” to provide greater transparency so the taxpayers can see where their money is going.
As I mentioned several times in this thread, I think what Ron Paul did, that is, keeping as much money as he could out of the hands of Obama and his union and regulatory thugs, is an act of patriotism.
Admit it, you don’t want to debate. You only want to smear.
I don’t smear, I state facts.
In 2009, Ron Paul out earmarked Nancy Pelosi while stating public funding of crap was a “tax rebate.”
Ron Paul has stated that 9/11 was America’s fault.
Ron Paul criticized America on IslamnoNazi Iran’s state run televison station.
Ron Paul has an endorsement of sorts from Code Pinko.
Some of Ron Paul’s supporters are Neo-Confederates. Some are neo-Nazis. Some are 9/11 Truthers.
None of this is Conservative thought, therefore it’s wrong. I will certainly do my best to make sure he doesn’t win the Republican nomination.