Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

United States Must Lead in Libya
Townhall.com ^ | August 26, 2011 | Michael Reagan

Posted on 08/26/2011 11:35:01 AM PDT by Kaslin

With approximately 135 different tribes within its borders, the hard lifting in Libya now begins. It is incumbent upon the United States to take a lead role in this vital area. No more of the Obama policy of leading from the rear -- the U.S. must lead, and must lead from the front.

The Libyan people have not breathed freedom since the tyrant Gadhafi took control of their government way back in 1969. It may not be easy for Libyans to learn how to be free after all that time, but we can and must help them.

There are factions in Libya that support terrorism, and we cannot allow them to gain control of a nation with $85 million a day coming from oil sales and with upwards of $150 billion in assets now frozen by international action. We also cannot allow known weapons supplies and raw nuclear material to get into the hands of the enemies of freedom now vying for power.

That lead role will be critical. With Gadhafi's 42-year-long dictatorship all but over, Libya's new leaders face what Peter Apps of Reuters called "the daunting task of restoring order, beginning reconstruction and avoiding collapse into conflict and chaos."

Libya's now-frozen assets need to be made available to the new government. Providing access to frozen funds and restoring oil exportation should enable the government to build a stable authority and support the change to a market economy.

"What you almost always find in these cases is that postwar planning hasn't kept pace with the planning for the conflict itself," according to David Hartwell, a Middle East analyst at IHS Janes, as reported by Reuters. He adds, "There's going to be a lot to do"

Gadhafi's corrupt dictatorship spent more than 40 years imposing a socialist framework to put most of the economy into the fumbling hands of the government; perhaps 70 percent of all Libyans are dependent on government employment of some sort. New leaders will inherit an infrastructure damaged by corruption, neglect and war. It might take years to restore oil production and rebuild the economy.

Mohsin Khan, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, told msnbc.com, "It's going to be a tough economic situation. The new Libyan government will have a choice to make -- which way it wants to go. That's critical in determining how it rebounds."

This is reminiscent of the choices faced by governments in Eastern Europe after the fall of the Soviet Union.

In the face of all this chaos, America's leadership plays golf in Martha's Vineyard, seemingly oblivious to the perils involved in the political chaos of the Middle East.

In the meantime, the need to unfreeze Libyan assets so that funds can quickly flow back into Libya was addressed by Catherine Ashton, the European Union foreign affairs chief who insists that frozen funds flow freely back into Libyan coffers.

"This is about making sure that people are paid, civil servants police officers, whoever, also making sure that there are supplies in the shops and so on, helping to make the economy function," Ashton said in a speech Tuesday.

She didn't add that it's hard to do all that on the ninth hole of a golf course in Martha's Vineyard.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: gandalftb

“It will be a factional mess for years driven by greed and revenge.”

I am very much concerned it will become another Somalia.


21 posted on 08/26/2011 12:21:46 PM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas

It’s all a moot point, we are not going to push aside the Brits, French, Italians and Chinese that all have significant inroads in Libya. Libya is their future not ours, let them have it.


22 posted on 08/26/2011 12:26:03 PM PDT by gandalftb (11th MEU TRAP force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

NO ,let them step up and find their own way.


23 posted on 08/26/2011 12:31:20 PM PDT by Cheetahcat (Carnival commie side show, started November 4 2008 ,A date that will live in Infamy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Give Libya back to Italy, heck I’ll even let the Germans have it. Rommel would be happy.


24 posted on 08/26/2011 12:33:02 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Levante

awww c’mon, get with the spirit.

The president has endorsed the MB for Egypt. That is the presidents real position.

Guaranteed, he will endorse the MB and Al Qaeda for Libya as he already knows that the MB are forming their new MB alliance nations.
And he called it “democracy” to sell to you and me. Democracy is anathemic to Islam. Totally antithietical.
So it boils down to a caliphate play in which the pResident is involved. Its got the presidential seal.

And you have to keep in mind that we are now “the largest muslim nation.”

....All Hale Caliph Obama!

The chief pot stirrer.


25 posted on 08/26/2011 12:35:59 PM PDT by himno hero (Obamas theme...Death to America...The crusaders will pay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb; All

“It’s all a moot point, we are not going to push aside the Brits, French, Italians and Chinese that all have significant inroads in Libya. Libya is their future not ours, let them have it.”

I agree, it is entirely moot....because the conditions I specified before I would “support” US involvement would NEVER happen, even under a conservative administration.

Libya is doomed to years of civil war and senseless bloodshed.


26 posted on 08/26/2011 2:10:21 PM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The author suffers from a serious case of Bull Hockey.

The United States should never have gotten involved in this morally skewed conflict.

If the US is to recover any self-respect in ethical terms, we should distance ourselves as much as possible from this indefensible and illegal hodgepodge.


27 posted on 08/26/2011 3:07:38 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer

This action had nothing to do with the US, by any stretch of the imagination, it was the personal global agenda of Islam that the Ghazi in OUR White House is promoting.


28 posted on 08/28/2011 7:12:05 AM PDT by himno hero (Obamas theme...Death to America...The crusaders will pay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Is this one of those b.s. "we broke it, so we bought it" deals?

Screw you, Mike.

29 posted on 08/28/2011 7:20:17 AM PDT by Flag_This (Real presidents don't bow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson