You're a PDSer and if you continue being ridiculous, yes. I'll tell Jim. He posted that as a warning. Whether you listen or not is your choice and you know the consequences. THEY are obvious. So what will your excuse be? And will YOU cry?
Better tell Jim about this post, too: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2769997/posts (Sarah plays chess while the rest play checkers) and be sure to tell him about all the not-loving-Sarah-enough posters found there.
“Sure is a long winded commentary about somebody who is NOT going to run. I will bet that she will eventually do fund raisers for Perry.”
“I agree about her not running. For the last year or more I’ve been saying it and been attacked by some in here for stating what seems pretty obvious to many of us. Outside of her hard core base, Palin is viewed as a bad...”
“While Perry, Romney, and even Ron Paul poll competitively with Obama....
Aug. 11- 12 Rasmussen poll presenting hypothetical match-ups, President Barack Obama would beat her by 17 points, while Romney, Perry, Bachmann and Paul are within striking distance.
..trailing Obama by 21 points in a head-to-head McClatchy-Marist poll earlier this month; and by 14 points in a CNN/Opinion Research poll.”
“Isn’t the point of Checkers AND Chess to actually win? So much for that metaphor.”
“I will bet that she will eventually do fund raisers for Perry
There is a lot still up in the air, but if I had to bet, I’d bet that Palin will not enter the race, and that she’ll support Perry.
So I agree with you.”
“Sarah Palin is a lot like coding, debugging, and deploying an ASP.NET website”
“Aaugh!!! the horror! the horror!”
“I’ll believe Palin is running when I see it.”