Yes, I didn't think IDIOTS could use the internet, so you surprised me with your mundane level of competency.
Barry v. Mercein
But MORE IMPORTANTLY, YOU have admitted openly lying to people here by quoting the lawyer for the side that lost and trying to pretend it was the Supreme Court that said it.
Wow, can't sneak anything past you. Funny though, I don't remember admitting to lying, I remember admitting I was mistaken. Lying is saying something which you know to be untrue. Apparently you are too stupid to understand the distinction.
Why would you do such a thing??? What is motivation to lie??? Why would YOU quote a footnote in a case and try to pretend it was the court that said it??? Lying is a sin and it is wrong!!! Plus, YOU make it worse by calling yourself "Diogenes" who went around looking for a honest man. Well KEEP LOOKING because YOU are NOT a honest man.
And you are lying to yourself. You get away with it because you are easily fooled. You still seemingly don't get the point. You said it was a dissenting judge, therefore YOU LIED! You are a LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE!
You got something WRONG so YOU LIED! At least you are a liar by YOUR standard, by the objective standard, not so much but by your standard? Absolutely. Fortunately, I judge myself by objective standards, so you can be a liar if you want to, while I'll just be mistaken.
So There!!!
What a twit.
No, I was too busy looking up the case to read your discussion with Kleon. Plus, if you will look at 203 above, I put quotation marks around the second thingie which means I was quoting somebody.
Perhaps you should start reading cases before you quote them. If you are sooo shoddy in YOUR research, people will continue to doubt your intentions.