I bet the Vattle Birther already knew this, plus when this came out a few months ago, I asked my BFF Fabia Sheen, Esq. about it and she pointed out this case was BEFORE the Chinese guy case whenever it was, plus some other cases, sooo what this is - is that the Vattle Birthers are just lying to everybody and trying to confuse them which makes them about the same as the Obots. This is why I don’t waste much time arguing with Vattle Birthers because either they are just big liars or pretty stupid, sooo why waste any major time on them???
>> “I asked my BFF Fabia Sheen, Esq. about it and she pointed out this case was BEFORE the Chinese guy case whenever it was, plus some other cases” <<
.
Wow, what a learned comment!
Did either you or your “BFF Fabia Sheen, Esq” finish the fourth grade?
You obviously have a computer, and it is obviously connected to the internet, so you could have looked up all the cases that are pertinent, and found out that you were full of Sh!t before posting this rubbish.
This case was before the 14th Amendment. Apparently the Supreme court was a bunch of "Vattel Birthers" in 1847.
BARRY v. MERCEIN, 46 U.S. 103 (1847)
4. The plaintiff in error being of legeance to the crown of England, his child, though born in the United States during its father's temporary residence therein,-twenty-two months and twenty days,-notwithstanding its mother be an American citizen, is not a citizen of the United States.
Oh! and LOOK! It was BEFORE the election! :)