From some of the comments on this thread, evidently two wrongs make a right.
Rubio is nice guy with potential,but he is NOT a natural born citizen, therefore not eligible to be President, nor Vice President.
The arguments for Rubio are not based in fact nor law.
A “citizen” is not automatically “natural born”.
The 14th Amendment makes NO one a natural born citizen.
The Supreme Court has never re-defined what a natural born citizen is.
Obama and his krew have turned the law on its head, and is defying anyone to stop them.
Far be it from Freepers to aid and abet them.
‘The Rule of Law and the “Natural Born Citizen” Clause’
Excerpt: Obama’s father, a British citizen, was never a U.S. citizen. Hence, Obama was not born in the country to citizen parents. Because Obama’s father was not a U.S. citizen, Obama, even if born in Hawaii which he has yet to conclusively prove, was also born with allegiance to and citizenship in Great Britain. Consequently, Obama was not born with no foreign allegiance and with sole loyalty and attachment to the United States. He was not born with sole allegiance and unity of citizenship in the United States at birth, a natural condition that the Founders and Framers wanted in future presidents and commanders in chief. He was not born under the full and complete allegiance and jurisdiction of the United States. He is not and cannot be an Article II “natural born Citizen.” Under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, he is therefore not eligible to be President and Commander in Chief.