Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tet68
Skynews says Obama is to make a statement later this evening.

Is he going to tell us how many Libyan casualties were saved by Obama going to war (sort of)? The stated rationale for the war was to minimize casualties.

But instead of going in quickly and decisively and ending the regime, Zero started it but did not follow it up, leading to months and months of bloodshed and unreported number of casualties.

Will the MSM breathlessly report the number of Libyan casualties in Zero's war, like they did every week the Iraqi casualties in W's war? Oh wait, I forgot there is no mainstream press, only a giant White House information office.

20 posted on 08/21/2011 5:13:18 PM PDT by Meet the New Boss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Meet the New Boss

But instead of going in quickly and decisively and ending the regime, Zero started it but did not follow it up, leading to months and months of bloodshed and unreported number of casualties.

Oh like Iraq is better....we have been there 10 years. A complete and utter waste of money and lives from almost day one. We don’t fight wars quickly anymore. Quite frankly I am surprised this war went so quickly. I thought it was going to be another Iraq.


110 posted on 08/21/2011 7:15:26 PM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson