Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 21twelve
I imagine you meant “it IS common...”. Agreed. But, even if they did not have to shut down plants, and ONLY had to spend $128 billion, that cost will still be passed down to the consumer. Just like their taxes are.

Most utilities must have any proposed rate increase approved by some state regulatory agency. Therefore, they may not be able to pass increased costs onto their customers.

Many politicians, and even some freepers, believe that investors seeking a return on their investment should take a backseat to other goals.

67 posted on 08/21/2011 3:19:03 PM PDT by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: monocle

“Most utilities must have any proposed rate increase approved by some state regulatory agency.”

Good point - it’s not exactly the free market. I imagine they must also get approved by the State if they want to throw in the towel as well?


68 posted on 08/21/2011 4:20:23 PM PDT by 21twelve (Obama Recreating the New Deal: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

To: monocle

“So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can; it’s just that it will bankrupt them because they’re going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that’s being emitted.”

http://www.examiner.com/right-side-politics-in-national/obama-will-bankrupt-the-coal-industry

the goal is to bankrupt evil BIG COAL-there will probably be special EITC type credits for “low income” people.


70 posted on 08/22/2011 7:50:07 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB (My mind is like a steel trap: rusty and illegal in 37 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson