Since you claim to be smart with a physics degree, you should have no problem understanding why people ridicule you, but I’ll go ahead and type it out for you.
1. Since NASA does not have 9/11 as the perihelion date, that pretty much negates all of your theory. Still, let’s keep digging into this.
2. This ‘conspiracy’ would mean millions of people are involved in the cover-up all around the world. From amateur astronomers to people who work for NASA and similar agencies around the world.
3. People naturally look for and see patterns, more often than not they are about as relevant as seeing animals in cloud formations. Normal people can distinguish between seeing these possible patterns as just coincidence or the mind making connections that isn’t there. Seeing and believing patterns like you are pointing out with secret messages in names and secret meanings behind dates and numbers, is usually considered a psychosis.
So, as a smart, educated person, which is more logical:
You found a top secret code/meaning inside the name of the Comet Elenin that reveals a mystery behind its discovery.
OR
It is a coincidence.
If you still think it is the first one, look up all of the millions of these type of ‘discoveries’ on the internet and see how many came true. If that doesn’t work, seek professional help.
(or the third possibility, you are some Anonymous, DU, or other troll throwing crap in here to try to see who bites to make fun of FReepers).
OK,
Number ONE, I have never been to DU, and am NOT a troll.
I am a TEA Party person, as well, attending all 3 of the Boston area Tax Day TEA Parties.
My videos are on youtube under the channel name “bluesmovers”.
Here is ANOTHER COINCIDENCE for you...
The Paper - Astronomical alignments as the cause of ~M6+ seismicity
I have a degree in Physics, was curious, and this now has my full attention.
Looks like Mensur Omerbashich of the European Royal Society Physics dept is taking this “comet” into account for the “robustness” of the greater earthquakes over the last few years, including alignments between Elenin-Earth-Sun within 3 days of the 2/27/2010 Chilean and 3/11/2011 Japanese great earthquakes. His paper constantly refers to C2010/X1 as “the Elenin”. If this was just a comet, I wouldn’t expect any effects, as it would have a very small mass to Earth and Sun relatively. A really curious fact about this “comet” is that the perihilion date (closest to the Sun) of this comet Elenin is 9/11/2011 ... ELENIN ... NINe ELEven... how could that reasonably also be the discoverers LAST NAME? And there is more, MUCH more out there about this... (and a lot of silliness mixed in, as well)... download the paper pdf file and READ IT. The next alignement is Sun-Elenin-Earth on 9/26/2011 with Elenin approximately HALFWAY between us and the Sun. Yikes!
Astronomical alignments as the cause of ~M6+ seismicity
Mensur Omerbashich
http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.2036
(Submitted on 11 Apr 2011 (v1), last revised 4 Jul 2011 (this version, v3))
Abstract: I here demonstrate empirically my georesonator concept in which tidally induced magnification of Earth masses’ resonance causes seismicity. To that end, I show that all strong (~M6+) earthquakes of 2010 occurred during the Earth’s long (t>3 day) astronomical alignments within our solar system. I then show that the same holds true for all very strong (~M8+) earthquakes of the decade of 2000s. Finally, the strongest (M8.6+) earthquakes of the past century are shown to have occurred during the Earth’s multiple long alignments, whereas half of the high-strongest (M9+) ones occurred during the Full Moon. I used the comet C/2010 X1 (Elenin), as it has been adding to robustness in terms of very strong seismicity since 2007 (in terms of strongest seismicity: since 1965). The Elenin will continue intensifying the Earth’s very strong seismicity until August-October, 2011. Approximate forecast of earthquakes based on my discoveries is feasible. This demonstration proves my hyperresonator concept, arrived at earlier as a mathematical-physical solution to the most general extension of the georesonator concept possible.
My comment to all:
If the ONLY object in question was a Comet, why the paper from Mensur? Why did he include Comet Elenin AT ALL? He doesn’t go so far as to say the comet itself has a large mass, but the implication of large mass is definitely there.