[airborne]

So - since you are a serious physisist, and this is supposed to be a serious thread, with serious consequences . . .

Could you give me a date . . .

A "pass or fail" date . . .

So that one of us can come back and say to the other -

" See? I told you!"

When wil the world end? Your "NLT" date.

[Bluesmover]

No, there is no date or anything.

The ONLY THING I am saying is that the COINCIDENCE of the DISCOVERER’S NAME and the 2 BASIC FACTORS about the Comet is HIGHLY UNLIKELY, therefore NOT BELIEVABLE.

That is all.

There IS a Comet, I believe, following the trajectory published by NASA and JPL.
We also know that for the past 2 weeks NASA has pointed STEREO B (solar observatory behind the earth orbital track) directly at the Comet for 2 HOURS per day.

If it was as INSIGNIFICANT as they say, why did they do this?

I just don’t believe the STORY about it’s DISCOVERY.
THAT makes me generally suspicious about what is said through official channels about it.

How can you explain the coincidence?
It is pretty unlikely, you’d have to agree, wouldn’t you?

Is that clear enough for you?

[stars & stripes forever]

So what is the bottom line here?