Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul Ad - THE ONE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=pChzOaIeyxY ^

Posted on 08/16/2011 3:01:00 PM PDT by free_life

Ron Paul Ad - THE ONE

What if the American people didn't listen to their handlers and actually elected this guy?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: moonbats; ronpaul; sourcetitlenoturl; theone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-156 last
To: dragnet2
Awww...did Mom wake you too early this morning? It's awfully damp down in the basement and she hates seeing you so pale.

Get lost, tool.

141 posted on 08/17/2011 10:08:03 AM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

And, the expert speaks.


142 posted on 08/17/2011 10:23:01 AM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud dad of an Army Soldier currently deployed in the Valley of Death, Afghanistan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2; buccaneer81
Then when asked if they're such a global threat why not take them out, ya then ya tell us because it will piss off the rest of the mideast.

Tell me, o'mighty one, which FReeper has the power to unilaterally decide to nuke Iran? You ask a rhetorical question which cannot be answered by anyone on FR, and then become angry when your question isn't answered. Unbelievable. As I stated before, when you become a member of the powers with decision making ability let us know.

143 posted on 08/17/2011 10:27:54 AM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud dad of an Army Soldier currently deployed in the Valley of Death, Afghanistan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

“What does this mean?”

Do a little research on Ahmadinejad and mahdism. The man’s a religious kook who thinks he communes with God and is on a mission to hasten the end times. He’s stated that the acquisition of nuclear weapons is an essential element of achieving this goal. An Iran with nuclear weapons is simply not comparable to the USSR with similar weapons.


144 posted on 08/17/2011 2:59:54 PM PDT by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Brett11

“They don’t have the capability to deliver those warheads. Iran doesn’t even have an air force.”

They may not have an Air Force but they have one of the most agressive missile development programs in the world. They have launched two satellites into orbit meaning they have achieved an intercontinental missile capability. Add a little more payload and a nuclear warhead and you will have that capability.


145 posted on 08/17/2011 3:05:22 PM PDT by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

Agreed. See post # 127. Iran does have a rather large Air Force, despite what some may think.


146 posted on 08/17/2011 3:10:23 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
Do a little research on Ahmadinejad and mahdism. The man’s a religious kook who thinks he communes with God and is on a mission to hasten the end times.

Research? Why? Even those drooling in cups understand the entire MidEast is full religious nut cakes.

An Iran with nuclear weapons is simply not comparable to the USSR with similar weapons.

Oh, now it's with similar weapons as the Russians/Soviets? Get real, The Soviets brutally killed millions, they have a substantial military, air force, armies and navy complete with with nuke subs, not to mention enough ICBM's to bounce Iran off the moon and back.

He is on a mission to hasten the end times.

So what? This planet has better chance being hit by a 400 mile wide asteroid this month, than that nut job causing "End times".

Not going to happen. And if it did, those in the region deserve everything they get for not taking out this guy who's supposedly going to destroy the planet.

wow..

147 posted on 08/17/2011 3:21:06 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

“So what? This planet has better chance being hit by a 400 mile wide asteroid this month, than that nut job causing “End times”.”

Whether a nutcase with a nuke can actually cause the ‘end times’ is less important than whether he believes he can.

“Not going to happen. And if it did, those in the region deserve everything they get for not taking out this guy who’s supposedly going to destroy the planet.”

He’s not trying to ‘destroy the planet’, he’s only trying to destroy the ‘Great Satin’ and bring forth the Mahdi who will destroy all who are not true believers.


148 posted on 08/17/2011 4:39:22 PM PDT by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: free_life; ElkGroveDan; Lazlo in PA; Allegra

What if just one Pauler realized that the rest of us do not have “handlers” any more than he does and what an inane, insulting and down right counter productive it is to tell fellow FReepers of all the groups in the US to ignore our “handlers.”

No, if just one Pauler ever admitted that any other group thinks at least as well as he did when he posted that we should ignore our “handlers,” the Universe would come unbalanced and we’d all be doomed.

(Or he wouldn’t really be a Pauler - probably just a corporate stooge who helped Bush plant bombs in the World Trade Center.)


149 posted on 08/17/2011 5:07:16 PM PDT by hocndoc (http://WingRight.org)(I've got a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.)(RIAing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rosepetal2010

Correct fear is useful for avoiding danger, injury and death.

Nevertheless, thank you for another perfect example of a Pauler who claims that the rest of us do not use our brains.


150 posted on 08/17/2011 5:15:48 PM PDT by hocndoc (http://WingRight.org)(I've got a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.)(RIAing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Conservative9

So tell me why Jefferson sent the Fleet to Tripoli with out Congress approval?


151 posted on 10/04/2011 4:50:41 PM PDT by Kartographer (".. we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

Article 1 Section 8: “To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations.” To that end congress DID authorize “small vessels” to go into the Mediterranean for service. President Jefferson was Commander of this brand new Navy and was careful to not press them into more service than congress had granted. In his own words, “I sent a small squadron of frigates in the Mediterranean, with assurances to that power of our sincere desire to remain in peace, but with orders to protect our commerce against the threatened attack. The measure was seasonable and salutary. The bey had already declared war in form. His cruisers were out. They had arrived at Gibraltar. Our commerce in the Mediterranean was blockaded, and that of the Atlantic in peril. The arrival of our squadron dispelled the danger. One of the Tripolitan cruisers having fallen in with, and engaged the small schooner Enterprise, commanded by Lieutenant Sterret, which had gone as a tender to our larger vessels, was captured, after a heavy slaughter of her men, without the loss of a single one on our part. The bravery exhibited by our citizens on that element, will, I trust, be a testimony to the world that it is not the want of virtue which makes us seek their peace, but a conscientious desire to direct the energies of our nation to the multiplication of the human race, and not to its destruction. UNAUTHORIZED by the constitution, without the sanction of Congress, to go out beyond the line of defense, the vessel being disabled from committing further hostilities, was liberated with its crew. The legislature will doubtless consider whether, by authorizing measures of offence, also, they will place our force on an equal footing with that of its adversaries. I communicate ALL material information on this subject, that in the exercise of the important function considered by the constitution to the legislature exclusively, their judgment may form itself on a knowledge and consideration of every circumstance of weight.”
Same as the constitutionalist Ron Paul would do- protect us without breaking his oath to uphold the constitution.


152 posted on 10/04/2011 6:16:44 PM PDT by Conservative9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Conservative9

Look you and Paul want to let these people kill us at will. To that I think the best answer to ‘Paulist’ I’ve ever seen was from our own Jim Robinson:

“Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!”
- Jim Robinson, Sept, 30, 2007


153 posted on 10/04/2011 6:22:26 PM PDT by Kartographer (".. we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

Since you have no argument against the facts of history your only retreat is to call names and advance false statements. Ron Paul would defend this country and would have the means to do it if we did not have 900 active basis around the country. Like Jefferson he is a non-interventionist not an isolationist, and understands the first task of the federal government is to defend the States. Neither are pacifists. You fail to be able to make that distinction. As for me, the father of special ops soldier in Afghanistan- he says we are not being allowed to fight for fear of hurting Muslims. So don’t preach to me about “letting” terrorists kill us. It is both parties that have sent these men to an undeclared war and tied their hands. Even so they have won the war and now sit as cannon fodder for the politicians to beat their chests over. Wake up and be free and strong. My doctrine is to 1. bring them all home and 2 put them on our southern border to close it off. 3. Rapidly build a missile defense system for our country. 4. Tell every Muslim nation that they are free to kill their own people but if they hurt one of ours at home or abroad we will immediately make glass out of their holy sites and capitol. Then keep your word. Number 4 should be done first.


154 posted on 10/05/2011 7:39:39 PM PDT by Conservative9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

Since you have no argument against the facts of history your only retreat is to call names and advance false statements. Ron Paul would defend this country and would have the means to do it if we did not have 900 active basis around the country. Like Jefferson he is a non-interventionist not an isolationist, and understands the first task of the federal government is to defend the States. Neither are pacifists. You fail to be able to make that distinction. As for me, the father of special ops soldier in Afghanistan- he says we are not being allowed to fight for fear of hurting Muslims. So don’t preach to me about “letting” terrorists kill us. It is both parties that have sent these men to an undeclared war and tied their hands. Even so they have won the war and now sit as cannon fodder for the politicians to beat their chests over. Wake up and be free and strong. My doctrine is to 1. bring them all home and 2 put them on our southern border to close it off. 3. Rapidly build a missile defense system for our country. 4. Tell every Muslim nation that they are free to kill their own people but if they hurt one of ours at home or abroad we will immediately make glass out of their holy sites and capitol. Then keep your word. Number 4 should be done first.


155 posted on 10/05/2011 7:39:58 PM PDT by Conservative9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Conservative9

Tell it to Jim Robinson.


156 posted on 10/05/2011 8:25:04 PM PDT by Kartographer (".. we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-156 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson