[Protect the Bill of Rights]

It almost seems as though you followed this case via the commentators, many of whom did not like the fact that the prosecution did not pull rabbits out of a hat or come up with any CSI actors to “prove” the case.

Please give me a little credit. I live in the real world, not one run by talking heads and television dramas. I think the prosecution could have done a better job of presenting the evidence.

They needed to build a better narrative for the jury. Start in the beginning, working their way through to the end, weaving the evidence together slowly and deliberately. The closing was powerful, but by then, it was too late (IMO).

Seems like an honest opinion to me. No rabbits. No tricks. No CSI moments.

[at bay]

” I think the prosecution could have done a better job of presenting the evidence.”

Did you watch the trial from start to finish? I don’t think so, and if you didn’t then your comments, like other shoot from the hip know nothings: Hannity, Levin, Whorealdo etc., are an undeserved insult to a very hard working da team. Overwhelming evidence of guilt.