“Karl Rove personally took Rick Perry and switched him to Republican from Democrat and ran his first statewide campaign, for Agriculture Commissioner.
Best to vote for anyone but Perry.”
Oh this is great logic. Let’s see, Karl Rove ran a campaign for Perry a couple decades ago, but they have been adversaries for the past decade, including when Rove, Bush and Co backed KBH in her 2010 run to unseat Perry as governor. Then even more recently, Rove is out dissing Perry on FNC.
Okay, yeah you’re right, that definitely tells me we gotta support anybody but Perry. So if it comes down to Perry vs Obama in the general,I guess we better stick with Obama, cause with these Rove ties from a couple decades ago, you just don’t know what you’ll be getting...
No, the reason why Perry is the ONLY Republican I would think of not voting for in NOVEMBER, is not simply the fact that he’s a Karl Rove Candidate. (Once a Karl Rove Candidate, always a Karl Rove Candidate).
It’s that he’s a Globalist RINO (See Bilderberg, Trans-texas Corridor, Gardasil on Globalism). Romney is an ordinary RINO. About half the field are Ordinary RINOs. We get them every time. But Perry is a special type of RINO, the worst type of RINO, the Globalist RINO.
If there was a currency collapse, would Rick Perry go along with a one world currency scheme? Nothing in his record indicates he’d be against it. I would think that Democrats and Republicans alike would be against it. It’s takes a Globalist (and actual pedigreed Globalists are rare) to be for that. Would Rick Perry give thousands of US acres to the Chinese and allow the Chinese to self govern that area? Because we owe the Chinese money? Instead of using one of many less harmful methods?
The arguments that people use for Perry could be used for Buddy Roemer.
If Buddy Roemer was the nominee, would you vote for him? Who cares - you’re trying to convince us that Buddy Roemer is better than good candidates, or at least candidates that don’t completely suck.