“Orly tries to issue a subpoena as an officer of the court, but she isn’t admitted to practice before the court”
Orly is not a member of the Federal bar?
“she tries to engage in discovery before the mandatory Rule 26 (d)(1) hearing has been held”
This is why I asked if a scheduling order has been issued because that creates and exception under 26(d)(1) stating discovery may proceed “by court order.” Obviously the parties aren’t going to agree to a “stipulation” under 26 (d).
Candidly, I know NOTHING about Orly. People say she is crazy and her voice grates on them etc. Orly’s legal skills are not the issue. Full disclosure and transparency are the only issues.
Again, my point is that the incompetence of this woman has completely overshadowed whatever underlying merit her argument may have originally had. Her various pleadings are probably available on the PACER system and can be found on line with a simple Google search. These are not the work of a serious advocate.