[Happy Rain]

He had to back track later by saying he was not fine with homosexual marriage and was only talking about NY’s 10th Amendment right to have unholy matrimony.

I believe in the veracity of spontaneity with back tracking being a desperate cover-up.

He said what he said and the glee in his voice when he said he was JUST FINE with homosexual marriage in NY was all one needed to hear.

[South40]

I believe in the veracity of spontaneity with back tracking being a desperate cover-up.

Good point. So do I.

He said what he said and the glee in his voice when he said he was JUST FINE with homosexual marriage in NY was all one needed to hear.

Exactly.

[BobL]

“He had to back track later by saying he was not fine with homosexual marriage and was only talking about NY’s 10th Amendment right to have unholy matrimony.

I believe in the veracity of spontaneity with back tracking being a desperate cover-up.”

There really isn’t a way to figure out what he thinks about it. But since it’s not a Texas issue, maybe he hasn’t thought about it at all (which is pretty scary if he wants to be president), and that is why he was caught so flat-footed on the issue.