Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cringing Negativism Network
What in all your experience, would make you believe the PRC would stop with 10 carriers?

No claim of expertise. But what makes you think they'll go further. I go by what China already builds. Let take a look at tanks, bombers, surface ships, submarines, etc. Equipment, while outdated, they have built. But you don't see numbers anywhere near the former USSR. And China produces 4 times the steel that the former USSR did at their height. The former USSR, consumed only half as much energy as the US, but built a navy that was larger. China, on the hand, now consumes more energy than the US and the gap will only grow. Yet, you still don't see a navy that is larger than the US navy.

135 posted on 08/13/2011 2:24:39 PM PDT by ponder life
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]


To: ponder life

Not yet.

China at one time had a mind-bogglingly large navy.

With us sending so much money, technology and resources to China, I see no reason why China would not do so again.

We err greatly, attributing western thinking to China. China does not seek parity.

China seeks dominance.


136 posted on 08/13/2011 2:27:32 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network ("Cut the Crap and Balance!" -- Governor Sarah Palin , Friday August 12 2011, Iowa State Fair)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson