To: ejdrapes
8 posted on
08/12/2011 6:15:25 PM PDT by
Graneros
("It is no exaggeration to say that the undecided could go one way or another.")
To: Graneros
The only answer. Besides ABO, if she said no, and she ran and won, that would come back to haunt her: “You wouldn’t support Romney, so why should his supporters back you?”. You just don’t say you won’t support the nominee no matter who it is. I can say it, but I’m not contemplating a run.
22 posted on
08/12/2011 6:22:04 PM PDT by
Hugin
("A man'll usually tell you his bad intentions if you listen and let yourself hear it"--- Open Range)
To: Graneros
This would fall into the “damning with faint praise” category.
Yeah, I'd vote for Romney over Obama but then I'd vote for a turd in a suit over Obama if I could tell them apart.
39 posted on
08/12/2011 6:26:17 PM PDT by
Aevery_Freeman
(Thanks to the Change there is no Hope!)
To: Graneros
~"Wrong answer Sarah." Yep! She shoulda said ... "I would support Obama"!
To: Graneros
Unless she’s slated to be the VP, that might be why she said that. Else, agreed.
79 posted on
08/12/2011 6:38:39 PM PDT by
GreatRoad
(O < 0)
To: Graneros
I disagree. Although I wouldn't support Romney in the primary, if he wins the primary, I will enthusiastically support him, because ABO. Obama must go!!!
225 posted on
08/12/2011 7:29:28 PM PDT by
elpadre
(AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda" and its allies.)
To: Graneros
No, that was the right answer.
301 posted on
08/12/2011 7:59:02 PM PDT by
ngat
To: Graneros
You wouldn’t vote for her if she was the only one running!
630 posted on
08/13/2011 7:44:08 PM PDT by
Randy Larsen
(I Stand With Sarah!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson