The fact that it's his call to zot or not to zot is not the point I'm discussing here, but because he was pinged by some who say ejdrapes posted a misleading article, well that's not a consensus by everyone on this thread contrary to what some of you try to claim, the article write-up clearly states that Palin said ABO and that would have to include Romney if he gets the nod.
I think Jim's position is he will not tolerate anyone pushing Romney right now on the lead up to the nomination on his site, and I didn't see ejdrapes as doing that. Now what Jim's position will be IF Romney gets the nod is another story but apparently Sarah will support Romney over Obama and so will a lot of others if it comes down to that, that's all I got from the ejdrapes posting of this thread.
Read post #50.
I’m willing to bet that is the reason he was zotted.
Jim has made it very clear what his position will be if Romney gets the nomination. There will be NO support of Romney on this site, at ANY time.
Read (pronounced red) the whole thread. Eyes hurt. Even my hair hurts. And all the way through, you don’t get it?
ejdrapes posted an article that was INTENDED to start a flame war. KNOWING the title was misleading and that the premise was dishonest. Key word here is INTENT. Then to show how excruciatingly and blindingly brilliant he is, he ADMITTED it at Post #50...
“To: gov_bean_ counter
OK I’ll admit a little pot stirring here. Of course we know Palin KADs have never done that on FR before. ;-)”
Then he continued to partner up with the other resident PDSers...until Jim said NO.
Let me simplify. He made this post with the specific intent to START a flamewar. On FR that is NOT a good thing.
Norm brought it to Jim’s attention. others on this thread have said they would vote for romney in the context of ABO. A couple have even taunted Jim themselves. And they are ALL still here. Including you.
Or were you being deliberately obtuse?