Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TaraP
As I said before...Reagan was dealing with a totally different culture and generation than we have today....

And Palin is bit different than Reagan. A woman, in a culture more receptive to a woman President. Younger, at a time when we're willing to consider younger Presidents.

In one very important respect, though, Reagan and Palin are two peas in a pod: They took the heaviest artillery the MSM could bring to bear...and turned it right around on them, maintaining a good humor.

Palin's unique ability to not just neutralize, but utterly defeat, the even more rabid press of the 21st century is a solid gold campaign (and governance) asset.

Palin might do well in 2016 but not 2012....

If, as you insist, Palin can't win in 2012, what in the world is going to happen in the next four years that would change the landscape so?

816 posted on 08/11/2011 7:55:08 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies ]


To: okie01

Obama has the *Youth* vote.....Why because he can brainwash them...Destroy the *Family* and you can brainwash the youth who will be the generation of tomorrow.....

As I said I like Sarah Palin but I want Obama out, and at this time I do not believe she can beat him, if she was running maybe I would change my mind, but she isn’t at least not on 8/11/2011...

My vote is for Perry and I will evaluate his campaign (As it goes forward) when he annouces this Saturday his run for POTUS...


867 posted on 08/11/2011 8:01:27 PM PDT by TaraP (An APPEASER is one who feeds a crocodile - hoping it will eat him last)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 816 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson