[irish guard]

Call hopper what you want. But everyone ere acts as though his marital issues are the only reason he lost. This guy won in 2008 by less than 150 votes. He was never a sure thing regardless of what he did. I'm a sinner and admit not being perfect, so I'll just go back to keeping my mouth shut, reading posts, lurking and disliking what this site has become.

Lately everyone is looking for the perfect candidate, one with no flaws,whO believes in everything they do. They don't exist. So while I'll admit to Hopper not being an optimal candidate, I'd still take him over the woman who won. She is far worse when it comes to her positions and yet if I read some posts here correctly, kick the cheater out and take the taing, pro union abortionist. I have to live in this state and I'll take Hopper all day over his opponent.

[bvw]

Accenuate the Positive
Eliminate the Negative

Looks like the negative got eliminated. To the Hopper with the overly Randy one.

[jwalsh07]

Well pal, a good rule of thumb is that if a wife and kids can’t trust a politician a voter shouldn’t either. Not very libertine of me I know but there you have it any way.

[dfwgator]

Lately everyone is looking for the perfect candidate

No, just a candidate who keeps the biggest promise they will make in their life.