They could get pictures of the perps.
Well, they could start with WATER CANON. Which is the subject of this thread, and which the NUMBSKULL who is quoted in the text of the posted article of this thread doesn’t want to use.
Now, I’m not saying you’re going to do a LOT with water canon, but it would show at least an ounce of resolve, which is about a billion times heavier than what’s been shown so far.
As far as what’s legal and what’s not legal:
a) I’m not taking your word for that since you’ve shown yourself totally unreliable on such judgments when you jumped to the conclusion that the cops “shot someone in the back”
b) What’s legal or not legal is not what you and I have been “discussing” here, is it? You’ve been promoting the thesis that this is somehow the fault of the police. I have been attacking that thesis. Neither one of us has yet offered any solution. All I’ve done is express outrage at 1) what the rioters are doing, 2) what the response of the top levels of the British government is, and 3) [not so important, I admit] your bizarre statements regarding all this.
I take back what I just posted. Water canon is BULL SH*T.
Shoot all looters.
Period.
Shoot to kill.
(I only mentioned water canon because the powers that be won’t even go THAT far.)
They could get pictures of the perps.
Pardon me sam
I never ever indicated someone was shot “in the back” hello. I said the coppers shot someone they were trying to arrest and they should have waited for another day to arrest him...