rotflmao
Presidents have signed all kinds of treaties in the past that were never ratified.
Then why, pray tell, did President Bush rescind Clinton's signature on the ICC treaty? If it had no force, why would he bother?
It is because of the Vienna Convention.
That is my opinion on the matter. You obviously have your own opinion and thats fine. Notice I don’t feel the need to call you names.
Your opinion, apparently, need not be supported by cited fact, as if reality were subjective. The reality is that it does not take 67 votes to ratify a treaty. You were dead wrong.
If I were you, I'd ask for my money back on that degree.
Like I said to the other poster, worry about something that is going to happen. This isn’t.