Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NikkiB

That was scotsman who was attacking hooligans.

I wasn’t defending hooligans, I was defending former hooligans who have organized politically.

Who say you were injured by EDL members. Late me inquire, who provoked that incident? I’ll bet militant muzzies were at the bottom of it.

We don’t have “hooligans” over here but the tea paries I’ve attended could have used a security detachment of tough-looking young men. The opposition has no compunction about doing it and they always end up being the provocateurs and aggressors.

I see no way that the next 15 months will avoid numerous physical left-right confrontations. I hate giving the other side the physical advantage.


50 posted on 08/07/2011 1:15:52 PM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: Scanian
I know. I was agreeing with his comment to you. The EDL are hooligans. You're defending their actions despite a number of British freepers telling you they're no good.

It was only EDL members. There were no Muslims involved and it wasn't during protest.
51 posted on 08/07/2011 2:08:32 PM PDT by NikkiB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson