Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: buwaya

Yes, but Arabic isn’t a Celtic language. That’s the problem here.


45 posted on 08/04/2011 9:03:04 AM PDT by BenKenobi (Honkeys for Herman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: BenKenobi

Coptic however is related to Semitic tongues, and it is known that ancient Egyptian was an ancestor of modern Coptic.

So the simplest explanation of the European lineage of King Tut is that this was not representative of the Egyptian population of the time.


54 posted on 08/04/2011 7:53:07 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson