Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vigilanteman
What this means is that Egypt is currently occupied by mainly invaders and interlopers. They need to move out to make room for Spanish, English and French men. They may let some of the women stay as a humanitarian gesture. But any Egyptian men without the proper DNA link to King Tut need to go back to where they came from or pay a properly negotiated jizya to the rightful owners of the land.

There is an assumption that King Tut was of the same ethnicity as the Egyptians he ruled. Cleopatra and Ptolemy (despite the afro-centrists beliefs) were Greek -- after Alexander the Great conquered Egypt, he installed a new Macedonian ruling class. During the period around 2000BC to 1550BC the Hyksos from (apparently) western Asia (Middle East) invaded and ruled Egypt. So the genetics of the ruling class may not be representative of the common people.

41 posted on 08/04/2011 8:44:35 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (When you've only heard lies your entire life, the truth sounds insane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625

Well Tut’s dynasty lasted for quite some time. It’s possible that the people who ruled Egypt by the third dynasty were not the same as the people who ruled in the 1st and 2nd.

However, the origins of Tut and his family could be explained if they had Assyrian ancestry and Thutmose I married into the existing Egyptian royal family.

However, that still doesn’t change the enormous population dislocation of the end of the Roman Empire.


46 posted on 08/04/2011 9:06:35 AM PDT by BenKenobi (Honkeys for Herman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson